Kodak EasyShare V1253 reviews
You can find here the most interesting reviews / ratings from the well-known expert sites about the Kodak EasyShare V1253 Camera. Here are the reviewers:
|
- 04 January 2008 - |
|
- 3 |
|
- 14 December 2007 - |
|
- 3.5 |
|
- 10 November 2007 - |
|
- 2.5 |
CNET 's conclusion / rating - 04 January 2008 |
“ If you've got your heart set on a 12-megapixel camera--and unless you're printing larger than 8x10 or cropping in very tightly, you might want to scale your sights back to a lower-resolution model with optical image stabilization, such as the comparably priced Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T20--the Fujifilm FinePix F50fd still looks like the best of the group with a broader feature set, faster performance, and better photo quality than the Kodak EasyShare V1253. Still, if the real attraction for you is the V1253's large LCD and easy-to-use design, you should find the V1253 a satisfying option... ”
Complete review here
GoodGearGuide 's conclusion / rating - 14 December 2007 |
“ Kodak's V1253 takes great shots, is well designed and offers HD video recording; however, the speed to recover between shots can sometimes be in excess of five seconds, which really detracts from the user experience. Still if you aren't going to take lots of snaps in succession, it is an impressive offering... ”
GoodGearGuide's rating: |
|
- 3.5 |
Complete review here
LapTopMag 's conclusion / rating - 10 November 2007 |
“ Even with only a handful of pictures on our SD Card, the camera ran slowly. It took three seconds for the V1253 to start up, and seven to ready itself for the next shot. The rechargeable battery didn’t last as long as others we’ve tested; it died after just two days of intermittent use... ”
LapTopMag's rating: |
|
- 2.5 |
Complete review here
|
Comments (2)
Video reviews (2)
Camera info
Digg
del.icio.us
Reddit
Google
Home