Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX65 reviews
You can find here the most interesting reviews / ratings from the well-known expert sites about the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX65 Camera. Here are the reviewers:
|
- 28 August 2009 - |
|
- 3.5 |
|
- 22 August 2009 - |
|
- 4 |
ePhotozine 's conclusion / rating - 28 August 2009 |
“ If you're the kind of person that gets a camera on looks alone then this is definitely one for you. If build quality and handling is a factor in your decision then it's still a strong contender.
Image quality is pretty good, it has some nifty tricks up its sleeve but is let down in other areas. I'm amazed at the huge drop in quality from ISO400 to ISO800 as though noise reduction is simply switched off.
I don't like the picture going blurred at the edge of the lens which we can see in the colour test chart image. I think that could cause problems with landscapes or photographs of groups where items of interest are found at the edges of the frame.
Still, there's a lot going for it in the compact body so it's still worth considering. I think if you're a happy snapper who wants all the points I laid out above, you'd be more than happy with the results of this camera... ”
ePhotozine's rating: |
|
- 3.5 |
Complete review here
TrustedReviews 's conclusion / rating - 22 August 2009 |
“ The Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX60 is a good quality camera with a lot of effective and reliable automatic features. Build quality is excellent, performance is good and image quality certainly better than average. However it is very expensive compared other similarly-specified rivals, and the six-year-old body design is starting to look a bit stale... ”
TrustedReviews's rating: |
|
- 4 |
Complete review here
|
Comments (0)
Camera info
Digg
del.icio.us
Reddit
Google
Home
Simulator